Inerrancy and Worldview: Conclusion

Why have I written such a long series on inerrancy? Because it’s a subject that matters.

Inerrancy and Worldview: Modern Challenges to Inerrancy (Part 34)

How do we determine what is normal humanity?

Inerrancy and Worldview: Modern Challenges to Inerrancy (Part 33)

What does it mean to make ultimate commitments that are not God?

Inerrancy and Worldview: Modern Challenges to Inerrancy (Part 32)

Where does religious gullibility come from?

Inerrancy and Worldview: Modern Challenges to Inerrancy (Part 31)

To chalk all religious belief up to a weak-mind is to lose the foundation for all belief.

Inerrancy and Worldview: Modern Challenges to Inerrancy (Part 30)

The belief that we can attain intellectual objectivity apart from the inerrant revealed Word of God is naive, futile, and arrogant.

Inerrancy and Worldview: Modern Challenges to Inerrancy (Part 29)

Resolving the tension between modern psychology and the doctrine of inerrancy begins with being humble about our cognitive abilities.

Inerrancy and Worldview: Modern Challenges to Inerrancy (Part 28)

God’s Word is the norming norm

Inerrancy and Worldview: Modern Challenges to Inerrancy (Part 27)

God relates to our cultures without losing anything, and in so doing he gives us everything

Inerrancy and Worldview: Modern Challenges to Inerrancy (Part 26)

The principle of analogy can help us to arrive at Biblical conclusions