Why have I written such a long series on inerrancy? Because it’s a subject that matters.

How do we determine what is normal humanity?

What does it mean to make ultimate commitments that are not God?

Where does religious gullibility come from?

To chalk all religious belief up to a weak-mind is to lose the foundation for all belief.

The belief that we can attain intellectual objectivity apart from the inerrant revealed Word of God is naive, futile, and arrogant.

Resolving the tension between modern psychology and the doctrine of inerrancy begins with being humble about our cognitive abilities.

God’s Word is the norming norm

God relates to our cultures without losing anything, and in so doing he gives us everything

The principle of analogy can help us to arrive at Biblical conclusions